16 March 2026 The Prime Minister says the Federal Government is not appealing Sabah’s 40% entitlement. But the appeal filed in court challenges almost everything that makes that entitlement enforceable. That distinction is not technical. It goes to the heart of the matter. The High Court’s decision was never about whether Sabah has a 40% entitlement. The Constitution already provides for that. What the Court examined was whether that entitlement had been honoured in practice.

OLEH YB DSP WILFRED MADIUS TANGAU AHLI PARLIMEN P.170 TUARAN KHAMIS, 26 FEBRUARI 2026 Terima kasih Tuan Yang di-Pertua, 1. Rang Undang-Undang Perbekalan Tambahan 2025 memohon kelulusan Dewan untuk membelanjakan RM7.938 bilion daripada Kumpulan Wang Disatukan — melibatkan perbelanjaan mengurus dan pembangunan yang tidak diperuntukkan dalam Bajet asal 2025. Namun kita dimaklumkan bahawa perbelanjaan sebenar telah mencecah RM9.4 bilion. Dan semua duit ini sudah pun dibelanjakan

On 3 March 2026, the Government of the Federation of Malaysia filed an application to stay the High Court’s Order of 17 October 2025. That Order was not advisory. It declared a constitutional breach and issued mandamus compelling the performance of a constitutional duty within fixed timelines. The right of appeal is not in question. What demands attention is the sequence of events. The High Court directed that the constitutional review required under Article 112D be conducted

PEJABAT PREMIER SARAWAK OFFICE OF THE PREMIER OF SARAWAK KUCHING: 1. Today, 23rd of February 2026, the Sarawak Government has filed a petition in the Federal Court, to determine the constitutional validity and continued applicability of the Petroleum Development Act 1974, the Continental Shelf Act 1966, and the Petroleum Mining Act 1966 ("the federal Acts") to Sarawak. 2. These federal Acts adversely affect and deprive the rights of Sarawak to the natural resources, including

By Datuk Roger Chin KOTA KINABALU: The Federal Government has repeatedly assured the public that it is not appealing Sabah’s 40% special grant entitlement. On the surface, this sounds reassuring. It suggests acceptance of the High Court’s decision and a willingness to move forward in good Faith. However, the Memorandum of Appeal filed recently reveals the true extent of the appeal, and it tells a far more troubling story. While the Government has chosen not to challenge the m

Today, during the winding-up speech by YB Minister of Finance Datuk Seri Masidi Manjun, I rose in the Sabah State Legislative Assembly (DUN) to propose that a motion be tabled. The motion would call for an amendment to the Federal Constitution to allow Sabah to collect all revenues at source, with the Federal Government receiving its 60% share thereafter. This is the most practical way to end decades of dispute over figures, data, and calculations. When Sabah collects at sour

Tuan Speaker, dengan izin Tuan Speaker, Honourable Members of this Assembly, and the people of Sabah, I enter this Legislative Assembly conscious of the honour of this appointment, and with full respect for this House as the highest legislative institution of our State. It is precisely because I respect this Assembly that I believe honesty, clarity, and courage have a rightful place within its walls. I am here with the same independence of thought that guided my work before e

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, Terima kasih atas peluang ini. Dalam kesempatan ini, saya amat berterima kasih kepada rakyat kawasan Moyog atas kepercayaan dan mandat yang dipertanggungjawab kepada saya sebagai wakil rakyat Moyog dan Ahli Dewan yang mulia ini. Tahniah juga diucapkan kepada YB Sulaman kerana kejayaan untuk membentukkan kerajaan Sabah yang stabil dan YB Karanaan atas pembentangan bajet yang berjiwa rakyat. Tuan Speaker, Saya bangkit hari ini untuk menyentuh dua isu yang a